AssignmentUnintended ConsequencesDetails:To frame the context for this assignment, consider the followingquestions: Leadership is hard; why? Perhaps the culprit is thetangential difference (disconnect?) between the intellectual, emotional,and inspirational decision relative to the problem. How do effectiveleaders reconcile the art and the science of decision making with thepossibility of unintended consequence?Find a case study on abusiness, social, or psychological ‘problem’ in which a decision yieldedan unintended consequence. In 1,250-1,500 words, analyze the unintendedconsequence(s) of that decision. Describe the process of decisionmaking that was used in this instance and why that process led to thedecision that was made. Despite the unintended consequence(s), were thedecisions ethical at the time they were made?Consider the following areas of concentration for effective decision making:Barriers.Cost of indecisiveness.Collaboration: strength and/or weaknesses.Unintended consequence: Inherited feature in the decision-making process.Recommendations or reconciliations to avoid unintended consequences.Example case studies include, but are not limited to:Unintended Consequence: BusinessAthlete-AgentCorporate Governance Reform and CEO CompensationInvasion of IraqThe Affordable Healthcare ActUnintended Consequence: SocialCommunism for Neighborhood RelationsCivil Rights Act of 1964Cuban Missile CrisisEmployer LayoffsEnd-of-Life CareHealth Care ReformImmigration Act of 1965Large-Scale Iron Ocean FertilizationRise of International Criminal LawTransportation Security (TSA) Administration PoliciesYouth Bike Helmet LawsUnintended Consequence: PsychologicalGender Aspects of Conflict Interventions (Bosnia, Somalia, etc.)Women in the WorkforceThe Workforce Investment ActUse three to five scholarly references for evidentiary support.Preparethis assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA StyleGuide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is notrequired.This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubricprior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with theexpectations for successful completion.You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center. Please Note: Assignment will not besubmitted to the faculty member until the ‘Submit’ button under ‘FinalSubmission’ is clicked.New AttemptTitleAttached DocumentsTurnitin ReportSimilarity IndexFinal Submission Click ‘New Attempt’ to start assignment or attach documentsApply RubricsUnintended Consequences 1Unsatisfactory0.00%2Less Than Satisfactory74.00%3Satisfactory79.00%4Good87.00%5Excellent100.00% 70.0 %Content 20.0 %Analyze the unintended consequence(s) of the decision made in the case study.Essay is irrelevant, it fails to analyze the unintended consequence(s) of a decision.Essay is somewhat relevant, it isunderdeveloped and inadequately analyzes the unintended consequence(s)of a decision.Essay is relevant, it adequately analyzes the unintended consequence(s) of a decision.Essay is relevant, it proficiently analyzes the unintended consequence(s) of a decision.Essay is relevant, it insightfully analyzes the unintended consequence(s) of a decision.25.0 %Describethe process of decision making that was used in the chosen case studyand why that process led to the decision that was made.Description of the decision making processthat was used in the chosen case study and why that process led to thedecision that was made is missing.Description of the decision making processthat was used in the chosen case study and why that process led to thedecision that was made is vague and inconsistent.Description of the decision making processthat was used in the chosen case study and why that process led to thedecision that was made is present and appropriate.Description of the decision making processthat was used in the chosen case study and why that process led to thedecision that was made is present, clear, and makes some connections toresearch.Description of the decision making processthat was used in the chosen case study and why that process led to thedecision that was made is clear, concise, and makes connections tocurrent research.25.0 %Discuss if the decision(s) were ethical at the time they were made, despite the unintended consequence(s). Discussion if the decision(s) were ethicalat the time they were made, despite the unintended consequence(s) ismissing. Discussion if the decision(s) were ethicalat the time they were made, despite the unintended consequence(s) isvague and inconsistent.Discussion if the decision(s) were ethicalat the time they were made, despite the unintended consequence(s) ispresent and appropriate.Discussion if the decision(s) were ethicalat the time they were made, despite the unintended consequence(s) ispresent, clear, and makes some connections to research.Discussion if the decision(s) were ethicalat the time they were made, despite the unintended consequence(s) isclear, concise, and makes connections to current research.20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness 7.0 %Thesis Development and PurposePaper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.Thesis and/or main claim are clear andforecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflectiveof the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive.The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesisstatement makes the purpose of the paper clear.8.0 %Argument Logic and ConstructionStatement of purpose is not justified by theconclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument isincoherent and uses noncredible sources.Sufficient justification of claims islacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws inthe logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.Argument is orderly, but may have a fewinconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims.Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sourcesused are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.Argument shows logical progressions.Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smoothprogression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources areauthoritative.Clear and convincing argument that presents apersuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sourcesare authoritative.5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)Surface errors are pervasive enough thatthey impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/orsentence construction are used.Frequent and repetitive mechanical errorsdistract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register),sentence structure, and/or word choice are present.Some mechanical errors or typos are present,but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentencestructure and audience-appropriate language are used.Prose is largely free of mechanical errors,although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures andeffective figures of speech are used.Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.10.0 %Format 5.0 %Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.Appropriate template is used, but someelements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting isapparent.Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.All format elements are correct.5.0 %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)Sources are not documented.Documentation of sources is inconsistent orincorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerousformatting errors. Sources are documented, as appropriate to
assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.Sources are completely and correctlydocumented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is freeof error.100 %Total Weightage
******CLICK ORDER NOW BELOW TO GET THE ANSWER TO THIS ASSIGNMENT OR ANY OTHER ASSIGNMENT, DISCUSSION, ESSAY, HOMEWORK OR QUESTION*******."
