The Improvement and Combination of Offline Physical Stores and Online Sales Strategies is a New Trend (2)

The Improvement and Combination of Offline Physical Stores and Online Sales Strategies is a New Trend

Name

Institution

The Improvement and Combination of Offline Physical Stores and Online Sales Strategies is a New Trend

The fashion industry has both traditional shops and online shops that are available to fulfill consumers’ purchaser interests. The plenty of choices that are available for the customers has caused a serious challenge for companies concerning the manner they ought to target consumers to sustain their competitiveness (Ashworth, 2012). After two decades of internet development as a key promotional tool, intercompany business relationships have significantly shifted. Such technical changes did not only improve the tools of promotion but also other aspects of marketing through electronic means. As a result, online marketing has emerged and companies not only view it as a promotional tool but a new form of marketing (Magrath & McCormick, 2013). Companies have massively invested in online marketing and sales in developed countries. In countries such as the United States, it has become like a routine to make online purchases, particularly for apparel products. Nonetheless, in countries such as India, people still depend largely on traditional stores like brick and motor shops. While in the recent past online shopping has become craze particularly among youngsters and teenagers, offline shopping is still considered way ahead in the fashion industry (Hua, 2016). In this case, fashion companies must integrate both online and offline marketing and sales in their strategies.

Offline Marketing

Throughout the continuous marketing growth and development by marketers and scholars have continued to develop new approaches and techniques, marketing definitions and ideas have also changed. In the 20th century, marketing was given a percipient definition that is essentially more than advertising and selling (Smith & Zook, 2012). During this period, the tools used and the changes made were pushing marketing improvements into efficiency and perfection; thus, it created misunderstandings such as the view of marketing as a process of creating needs as opposed to value (Arikan, 2011). However, different scholars have outlined various aspects of marketing that are important to create distinguished definitions of marketing. The Chartered Institute of Marketing illustrates that marketing the process of establishing, projecting, anticipating, and satisfying the requirements of customers more profitably. Such a process necessitates management decisions on pricing, promotion, product, distribution, and personal selling (Arikan, 2011). Offline marketing refers to the processes of advertising and selling using the mediums that are not connected to the internet. Its strategies primarily use offline mediums to develop the company’s awareness and its products as well as services (Smith & Zook, 2012). These campaigns include the use of print advertising such as signs and billboards, radio, and television channels. However, while the offline marketing is the traditional form of sales and advertising, the changes in the technological world and the development of the internet have resulted in the integration of offline to online marketing. Srinivasan et al., (2016) argues that because it is almost a prerequisite for companies to have websites today, the offline marketing strategies are more tied to online efforts.

Online Marketing

Kotler et al., (2018) defines online marketing as the process of applying digital technologies with online channel forms such as email, web, and database to contribute to activities of marketing to achieve profitable retention and acquisition of clients through improving customer understanding and delivering integrated targeted online communications that are aligned to their individual needs. Arikan (2011) illustrates that marketing is the process of keeping customers very close and forming strong relationships with them as well as ensuring that they are delighted and happy online. It involves a complex and dynamic dialogue where the customers are kept informed constantly with constant feedback.

Brogi et al., (2013) argue that online marketing continues to develop due to the changing online environment. Despite evolving definitions of online marketing, scholars agree that it is evolving and living alongside information technology’s development. Internet tools are considered important and indispensable in the creation of online marketing understanding and concepts. Technically the improvement of the online tool directly enhances online marketing. Arikan (2011) illustrates that online marketing has created a massive opportunity for the fashion industry to showcase its apparel products to millions of people at a given time. Some of the online strategies include social media marketing, email marketing, search engine optimization, and conversion optimization. These platforms have created an avenue through which fashion companies can engage their customers (Kotler et al., 2013). For instance, Facebook has billions of users who make social media marketing very interesting. It exposes brands to a huge population at an affordable cost (Brogi et al., 2013). Therefore, online marketing is the marketing form of the future and companies integrating it with offline marketing gain a high competitive advantage.

Role of Online Marketing in the Fashion Industry

Online marketing, if it is used in the right way, can raise the sales of the company and improve brand presence resulting in more profitability. It makes the product or brand to be available to the target audience of the firm. Rathnayaka (2018) argues that online marketing, when done, appropriately can enhance brand awareness and boost sales. Internet marketing is significant in the fashion industry because it aligns the purchasing behavior and decisions of customers. Öztamur & Karakadılar (2014) increasing number of consumers utilizes social media and other internet platforms to determine the preliminary price and product research which informs their decisions to make a purchase. Besides, online marketing enables businesses to create relationships with existing and prospective customers through low-cost, regular and personalized communication which is a significant departure from mass marketing (Rathnayaka, 2018). Online marketing is important in the fashion industry since it introduces brands and their products to the customers as they create awareness. For instance, social media platforms improve access to a wide range of populations and offer opportunities to focus on a specific target market (Rathnayaka, 2018).

Primarily, an important role of online marketing is the creation of personalized relationships with customers to retain and attract new customers. Online marketing allows personalization of offers to clients through the creation of a profile of their purchase preferences and history. Using such information brands can inform customers about new arrivals based on their preferences to create customer loyalty and retention (Blázquez, 2014). Through online marketing platforms, companies engage consumers with after-sale services such as follow-up to thank and confirm the satisfaction of a customer. Besides, online marketing creates a platform where customers can engage a brand by submitting their comments and complaints. Through these activities, the relationship between a fashion brand and consumers is enhanced.

Online marketing plays a critical role in the fashion industry concerning making sales. It enhances businesses around the clock opening of businesses without concentrating on the opening hours (Kawaf & Tagg, 2012). The products can be displayed, marketed and sold to customers in a 24-hour operational framework. Online marketing helps apparel companies to overcome the distance barrier. A brand can sell their product across the country and in other countries without opening up local outlets. Companies only have to open online shops where customers can access their products and purchase them (Rathnayaka, 2018). However, companies require having a working relationship with delivery service companies to facilitate the delivery of purchased merchandise to the individual consumer.

Relationships between Online and Offline Marketing

The relationship between online and offline marketing can be understood best through analyzing the product, price, promotion, and place which are the main components of marketing functions (Arikan, 2011). The product is defined in terms of both online and offline marketing. An online product is defined as the entity which is digitally encoded and digitally transmitted rapidly affordably and accurately. Offline product refers to anything that can be provided to a given market for acquisition or consumption that meets a need or want. The two products vary and their market behavior is different. Besides, offline products tend to behave differently in the online market. Therefore, the overall marketing environment results in the creation of integrated products that necessitate an integrated marketing approach; thus, the need for integrated online and offline marketing.

In determining prices, a brand ought to consider different steps including pricing objective, estimating the cost, establishing demand, assessment of competitors’ prices, and selecting price method and creating a price. On the other hand, online marketing prices are yet to be driven to marginal cost and one price law does not hold. Mustafi, Jost, and Nguye, (2011) argue that there are unique features that make innovations that are relative to offline marketing important and it is significant to access how the features affect successful online pricing techniques. For instance, online markets are dynamic platforms where competitors and customers can access information to influence their decisions. Pricing is such markets are considered to be sensitive and flexible (Roberts & Zahay, 2012). To reach the target customers and overcome competition, a brand must develop innovative pricing strategies for online markets.

On the promotion function, online marketing is regarded as the leading and fastest-growing type of direct marketing. Online marketing is considered as an integral part of the promotional mix of any company. It offers additional marketing instruments that help boost offline marketing activities (Mustafi et al. 2011). Primarily, online promotion utilizes communication in the internet platforms to create awareness concerning a site and also catalyze traffic into it. Online marketing is also considered as a collection of promotional techniques that uses digital platforms, for instance, social marketing, and search marketing. Roberts and Zahay, (2012) argue that online and offline promotional tools boost one another.

The place in the online platforms comprises all virtual stores while in offline marketing it entails the physical stores. The online place has a significant impact on the overall online marketing definition. Walsh et al. (2010) claim that a computer in online marketing is the place and the association between the supplier and customer is direct because customers are individually targeted. Mustafi et al., (2011) demonstrates that purchase, consumption, and distribution are critical elements in the definition of place. There products that exploit the three-element of place online while their others cannot. The product which cannot exploit the three components requires integration with the offline place to enhance their meaningfulness. Therefore, an integration between online and offline marketing is necessary for the fashion industry.

Theoretical Framework

Online-to-Offline Marketing

The online-to-offline (O2O) marketing model is key in locating customers online and influencing their visit to the real-world shops. The approach comprises of a combination of the traffic generator and payment model for merchants that promote offline purchasing. For instance, an online market cannot offer personalized designer apparel since one’s measures ought to be taken in an offline store. On the other hand, offline markets enhance access to information concerning promotions and store locations. Hence, a complementary model that helps fashion businesses to attract additional customers to their physical stores is essential. Chiang, Lin, and Huang, (2018) argue that the increase of social network marketing has enhanced the ability of consumers to access preferential information concerning different products from the channels and make purchases from physical stores. Leung et al. (2016) argue that O2O marketing has become an integral topic regarding channel integration. Consumers tend to factor various issues that impact their choice of the most appropriate medium to use in their transactions. For example, customers seeking to access quick information often select online stores using their handsets. On the other hand, consumers who want to try or test a product will always visit a physical store (Chiang et al, 2018). In this view, the factors that influence consumers’ searching and purchasing behavior concerning marketing and purchasing are very important.

E-commerce is growing at a faster rate compared to other channels across the globe. Chain et al. (2018) argues that the chances of online mediums eliminating offline markets are significantly impossible because the retail industry has transformed into the new online-to-offline concept where the two channels share similar significance in attaining prosperity. In this case, brands that seek to enhance their retailing commerce are expected to learn about O2O and how it benefits the fashion industry. The fashion industry benefits from the O2O model to market and advertises its products online to target potential customers create awareness and influence them to make purchases in the physical shops (Chiang et al, 2018). The O2O model advocates for the use of online platforms to expand brand popularity while becoming complements to the physical stores as opposed to competitors.

Online-to-Offline Search Process Adoption Factors

Yang et al. (2016) factors the availability of information concerning the product and establishes that the meaningfulness of the information impacts customers when selecting an appropriate channel for searching. The availability of information on online channels is the primary reason for customers to use them for searching and selecting products. When consumers can access information that helps them make price comparisons in a channel, they often tend to make a search and purchase on the same platform (Sarkar & Das, 2017). As a result, consumers who factor the availability of information are likely to search for products using online platforms.

Media richness is another component of O2O that enhances marketing channels which pass information to customers and assist them to make critical purchase decisions. Different scholars demonstrate that media richness significantly influences the way individuals search for product information. Gibson & Cantijoch, (2013) illustrate that customers affected by media richness transforms their intentions and always embrace online commerce to search for different information on a product. Both online and offline platforms offer a varying amount of media richness (Chiang et al, 2018). For instance, if customers want to access timely feedback as well as in-depth information on a product it is easier to engage a salesperson in an offline store.

Consumers are also influenced by search convenience. A majority of consumers often search for a channel that can easily and quickly relay product information. In this case, online channels often provide faster outcomes concerning the search for information on a product. Moreover, the online platforms are very convenient since consumers can search for the required information in the comfort of their homes or offices using their computers or mobiles. Studies illustrate that consumers’ choice of a channel is directly influenced by its convenience (Mahrous, 2016).

Consumers also factor the tangibility of the product. Chiang et al, (2018) argue that customers who do not buy products through online platforms do so since the online platforms do not give them access to assess the actual product quality. In this case, customers tend to evaluate the quality of the product at the physical store to minimize uncertainty. Besides, numerous researches demonstrate that tangibility is central in O2O marketing. Therefore, customers who consider product tangibility often tend to search for their products using offline platforms (Chiang et al., 2018).

Xiao & Dong (2015) argue that consumers are often concerned with how enjoyable a search process is when using a channel. Therefore, the platform that has hedonic aspects that enhances shopping experiences creates traffic. Different studied showed that consumers who are concerned with search enjoyment are likely to search for information in offline stores (Sarkar & Das, 2017). Consumers preferring to search for products in the stores often do so since they experience more pleasure in shopping and can get more face-to-face interactions with the staff compared to online platforms (Chiang et al, 2018).

Online-to-Offline Purchasing Process Factors

The product variety is one of the critical factors that consumers consider in the purchasing process. Shen et al., (2016) claim that when stores offer a high product variety, there are chances to attract more consumers who purchase products there. However, if a store offers assorted goods, customers may shift their purchase channels in reaction. Besides, promotion and price influence the purchase process of consumers. Anand et al., (2017) argue that prices are a significant factor that impacts on the choice of a platform to buy products. Studies have shown that consumers often use online platforms that promote products to make price comparisons and make purchases in physical stores (Chiang et al., 2018). Therefore, consumers who care about promotions and prices are likely to purchase using the online channel.

Purchase convenience is also important to consumers when they are choosing an appropriate platform to buy a product. Sarkar and Das (2017) illustrate that consumer likes to purchase a product through a platform which offers quality and efficient services concerning purchasing process. Roberts and Zahay (2012) indicate that the acquisition of a product with minimal time and mental investment is important to a customer. In this case, consumers prefer online platforms because it requires minimal time and stress. When a customer looks for a product in the offline store and does not find it, more time and energy will be spent in searching for the product in other stores. Therefore, consumers factor purchase convenience and influence their purchase through online platforms. The time of product possession may also affect the choice of a purchase platform. Research demonstrates that direct marketers often decrease the resistance of consumers to catalogs since it reduces the delivery time (Sarkar & Das, 2017). Customers may prefer offline purchases because they are guaranteed immediate ownership of the product, unlike online channel which requires customers to wait for it to be sent. In this case, customers concerned with immediate possession of a product are likely to buy using the offline channel.

The quality of sales service is also a crucial factor in choosing the appropriate channel to use in purchasing a product. Lin et al. (2013) claim that if a shop offers superior sales services, then customers may change their choice of a purchase channel. The service quality of sales comprises of assurance, responsiveness, reliability, empathy, and tangibility (Chaing et al., 2018). Consumers who factor the quality of services always purchase using offline stores since they offer superior sales services compared to online platforms.

Online purchase risk plays a critical role in impacting the decision of consumers to choose appropriate purchasing channels. The perception of uncertainty during the purchase process is considered high in online platform compared to the offline platforms. Chiang et al., 2018 postulates that customers always change their buying channels as a result of different risks that influence their purchase decisions. Consumers may fear the loss of personal information control when using an online platform. Several surveys show that online purchase potential risks impact consumers’ channel choice (Sarkar & Das, 2017).

Impact of Online Marketing on Consumer Behavior

Consumer behavior refers to a particular code of conduct where customers are identified in searching for a product and purchasing it to satisfy their needs (Mazaheri et al. 2011). Consumer purchasing behavior is considered as an internal process that occurs in the inner mind of the consumer and the decision on purchase is made based on the effect of the eternal and internal stimulus (Mittal, 2013). The online marketing platforms have made the availability of information extensive, and customers have become more powerful and knowledgeable since they can analyze information and make an informed purchase decision. As a result, enhancing the active presence and availability of information in the online platforms is essential in the business today (Mazaheri et al. 2011). The advancement of technology has resulted in the transformation of the traditional process of decision making among consumers into a more digitalized process where the use of the internet and digital platforms as a decision-making hub takes center stage (Rathnayaka, 2018). Indeed, the digital era has transformed the social trends that directly influence the changing behaviors of customers.

The dynamic and complex nature of consumer wants and needs drives marketers to change their strategies as well as to adapt to the new environments to satisfy the consumer. In the fashion industry, customers are finding exciting means of experiencing fashion purchases (Vinerean et al., 2013). Today, fashion customers have a variety of offline and online channels compared t to the past which enhances their choice experiences and marketers are capable to influence their optimal use of digital channels. The fashion industry has developed over time to embrace the trends in the work. The digital marketing culture has enhanced the ability of fashion brands to identify the preferences of consumers and how they are changing (Lee et al., 2011). Online marketing has created a platform where brands can engage consumers to identify and understand their preferences and needs. The online market has promoted customer intolerance since consumers can easily access other brands that may satisfy their needs. Besides, it has eroded consumer loyalty since customers can easily switch in the digital culture compared to the offline channels. Through the digital culture, unsatisfied consumers can easily destroy the brand reputation of a company within a short time. Therefore, companies need to be cautious and focus on offering superior sales service to overcome competition in the market (Rathnayaka, 2018).

Conclusion

While online marketing is on the rise, it is challenging for it to eradicate offline marketing and sales, particularly in the fashion industry. As such, it is effective when the two channels are integrated as illustrated by the O2O model. The online and offline platforms are supposed to support one another based on the preference of the customers. The online platform promotes convenience and accessibility of information but offline channels enhance immediate possession and superior sales service quality. Different consumers have different concerns and factors that influence their decision to use a given platform. For instance, the customers who care about tangibility, online purchase risks, and quality of service tend to use offline platform. On the other hand, customers who focus on the accessibility of information and convenience use online platforms. Therefore, fashion brands can implement the O2O model to ensure that customers can access information from the online platform about products and can also access the physical stores to make a purchase.

References

Arikan, A. (2011). Multichannel marketing: metrics and methods for on and offline success. John Wiley & Sons.

Anand, T., Nitpolprasert, C., Trachunthong, D., Kerr, S. J., Janyam, S., Linjongrat, D., … & Adam’s Love study team. (2017). A novel Online‐to‐Offline (O2O) model for pre‐exposure prophylaxis and HIV testing scale up. Journal of the International AIDS Society, 20(1), 21326.

Ashworth, C. J. (2012). Marketing and organisational development in e-SMEs: Understanding survival and sustainability in growth-oriented and comfort-zone pure-play enterprises in the fashion retail industry. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 8(2), 165-201.

Blázquez, M. (2014). Fashion shopping in multichannel retail: The role of technology in enhancing the customer experience. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 18(4), 97-116.

Brogi, S., Calabrese, A., Campisi, D., Capece, G., Costa, R., & Di Pillo, F. (2013). The effects of online brand communities on brand equity in the luxury fashion industry. International Journal of Engineering Business Management, 5(Godište 2013), 5-32.

Chiang, I. P., yi Lin, C., & Huang, C. H. (2018). Measuring the Effects of Online-to-Offline Marketing. Contemporary Management Research, 14(3), 167-189.

Gibson, R., & Cantijoch, M. (2013). Conceptualizing and measuring participation in the age of the internet: Is online political engagement really different to offline?. The Journal of Politics, 75(3), 701-716.

Hua, J. (2016, April). Electrical business mode development trend of traditional clothing brand. In International Conference on Education, Management and Computing Technology (ICEMCT-16). Atlantis Press.

Kawaf, F., & Tagg, S. (2012). Online shopping environments in fashion shopping: An SOR based review. The Marketing Review, 12(2), 161-180.

Kotler, P., Keller, K. L., Ang, S. H., Tan, C. T., & Leong, S. M. (2018). Marketing management: an Asian perspective. Pearson.

Leung, P. P. L., Wu, C. H., Ip, W. H., Ho, G. T., Cho, V. W. S., & Kwong, K. K. Y. (2016, November). Customer loyalty enhancement of online-to-offline marketing in beauty industry. In 2016 4th International Conference on Enterprise Systems (ES) (pp. 51-59). IEEE.

Lin, C. J., Lee, T. T., Lin, C., Huang, Y. C., & Chiu, J. M. (2013). Establishing interaction specifications for online-to-offline (O2O) service systems. In Proceedings of the Institute of Industrial Engineers Asian Conference 2013 (pp. 1137-1145). Springer, Singapore.

Mazaheri, E., Richard, M. O., & Laroche, M. (2011). Online consumer behavior: Comparing Canadian and Chinese website visitors. Journal of Business Research, 64(9), 958-965.

Mahrous, A. A. (2016). Implications of the use of social media for pre-purchase information searches for automobiles. International Journal of Technology Marketing, 11(3), 254-275.

Magrath, V., & McCormick, H. (2013). Marketing design elements of mobile fashion retail apps. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal, 17(1), 115-134.

Mittal, A. (2013). E-commerce: It’s Impact on consumer Behavior. Global Journal of Management and Business Studies, 3(2), 131-138.

Mustafi, S., Jost, L., & Nguyen, T. (2011). The Relationship between Online and Offline Marketing.

Öztamur, D., & Karakadılar, İ. S. (2014). Exploring the role of social media for SMEs: as a new marketing strategy tool for the firm performance perspective. Procedia-Social and behavioral sciences, 150, 511-520.

Rathnayaka, U. (2018). Role of Digital Marketing in Retail Fashion Industry: A Synthesis of the Theory and the Practice. Journal of Accounting & Marketing, 7(02).

Roberts, M. L., & Zahay, D. (2012). Internet marketing: Integrating online and offline strategies. Cengage Learning.

Sarkar, R., & Das, S. (2017). Online shopping vs Offline shopping: A comparative study. International Journal of Scientific Research in Sience and Tehnology, 3(1).

Shen, X. P., Cai, S., & Xu, D. (2016). Empirical Research on Consumers’ Purchase Intention of Service Online Group-buying. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, (4), 20.

Smith, P. R., & Zook, Z. (2012). Marketing communications: integrating offline and online with social media/PR Smith & Ze Zook. Philadelphia, PA: Kogan Page,.

Srinivasan, S., Rutz, O. J., & Pauwels, K. (2016). Paths to and off purchase: quantifying the impact of traditional marketing and online consumer activity. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44(4), 440-453.

Vinerean, S., Cetina, I., Dumitrescu, L., & Tichindelean, M. (2013). The effects of social media marketing on online consumer behavior. International Journal of Business and Management, 8(14), 66.

Walsh, G., Hennig-Thurau, T., Sassenberg, K., & Bornemann, D. (2010). Does relationship quality matter in e-services? A comparison of online and offline retailing. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 17(2), 130-142.

Xiao, S., & Dong, M. (2015). Hidden semi-Markov model-based reputation management system for online to offline (O2O) e-commerce markets. Decision Support Systems, 77, 87-99.

Yang, Y., Gong, Y., Yu, B., Zhang, J., & He, T. (2016, May). What Drives Online-to-Offline Commerce: From a Perspective of Consumer. In WHICEB (p. 26).