Name
Professor
Course
Date
Paper Critique
The paper was well presented showing all the small details it entails. The paper has made a huge contribution to current and previous research;
It has highlighted current contribution brought by radiotherapy.
In addition, it has been able to show limitations of the same
The new terms introduced in the paper are Neuro-oncology and radiotherapy. This paper has been built over radiotherapy technology, which has been developed over years. Therefore, the current study explains current development of the same. One of the most elaborated parts of the paper is about radiosurgery. This is because, the study has built its analysis from various past developed and come up with a unique research on the development of radiotherapy. It explains how advanced levels of radiotherapy can be used in treatment of various complications (Brada & Cruickshank, 1999).
The evidence analysis of radiotherapy in the paper is not well analyzed because there is not supporting quantitative data. The paper was properly written and outstanding, however, various potions of the paper could not be understood. For example the paper could not give exert information concerning the number of patients ever treated with radiotherapy? The type of evaluation used in the paper is objective wise evaluation. The benchmark used in the paper was a comparison benchmark between current and previous forms of radiotherapy development.
The new approaches used in the paper presented a unique presentation that offered the paper a good research mode hence hiving option for researchers to conduct future analysis on the same. The limitation of the mechanism is that it limits the paper from future criticism. I would recommend this paper to my peers especially my classmates because it is better researched and analyzed.
Reference
Brada, M., & Cruickshank, G, 1999. Radiosurgery for brain tumours. BMJ, 318(7181), pp. 411-412.
